Forensic Blogs

An aggregator for digital forensics blogs

December 10, 2018 by LCDI

Tool Evaluation Team – Autopsy Blog 3

Tool Evaluation Team – Autopsy Blog #3

Madi Brumbelow & Lyall Rogers

Testing Autopsy

For the last 3 months we’ve researched all about Autopsy: how to use it, comparing it to other tools, and mastering the art of forensic image analysis with our tool. Now, the results are in, results that you can see in our final report. We tested our tools based on time taken for analysis, user friendliness, and effectiveness in identifying artifacts, especially using keyword search. The team searched for keywords having to do with our scenario, and the main word searched was “cyanide”. Autopsy was effective in finding Web Artifacts, but deleted files having to do with cyanide did not show up. They could be found manually, unlike how they turned up automatically in the keyword searches for other tools, specifically EnCase.

A New Way to Search

Finishing the report wasn’t without its own surprises. As we were finishing up the search functions portion of the report, we took a final look at the tools section of Autopsy and discovered something peculiar. A new way to complete searches: File Search by Attributes.

File Search by Attributes does what you would expect from a keyword search; it goes through the entire image and finds what pertains to that specific keyword. In the case of this sample image, it was cyanide. We spent weeks trying to figure out why we couldn’t search anything outside of the web history, and low and behold, the answer was in the tools tab the entire time. Not only would it search the whole file, but it would give us the same number each and every single time we ran it. Unlike the normal keyword search, this tool had consistent results, but it was hard to find within the tool. Thankfully we found this before our report was finished, because now we are confident we truly know the ins and outs of Autopsy.

Reflection

Overall, we’re glad that we chose Autopsy to explore this semester. It’s an interesting tool, and very powerful considering it comes in at the low price of free! Our investment in the program has definitely paid off. Lyall is using it for personal use now, and Madi has to use it for her final project in a class. Turns out choosing a tool because its icon is a dog was the right path to take!

 

The post Tool Evaluation Team – Autopsy Blog 3 appeared first on The Leahy Center for Digital Investigation.

Read the original at: The Leahy Center for Digital InvestigationFiled Under: Digital Forensics, Uncategorized Tagged With: Analysis, artifacts, Autopsy, Blog Post, Champforensics, Champlain College, computer forensics, Digital forensics, Encase, files, LCDI, Projects, Student Work, tools, Update, web

November 15, 2018 by LCDI

SIFT Update 2

Introduction

This month at the Senator Leahy Center for Digital Investigation, we started analyzing our data. As a part of the SIFT research team, we used our knowledge of digital forensics to scan through files in order to find artifacts that would help us put our criminal behind bars. After we found artifacts, we went on to conduct keyword searches where we found very useful evidence for our investigation.

Experience

We have learned so much over the past month about SIFT. SIFT allows for artifact gathering, and keyword searching. Artifact gathering involves going into the imaged drive and gathering potentially incriminating files, or anything that could be useful to a digital investigators analysis. Pair that with keyword searching and a strong case can be built and argued in criminal court.

Originally SIFT had major issues in the srch_strings function within Autopsy. This was a major issue because srch_strings is used for keyword searching, an essential part of a digital investigator’s case.  Being new to SIFT was difficult because as a team we did not know how to fix this problem. Eventually, we learned the issue occurred because SIFT runs an older, unsupported version of Autopsy (Autopsy 2.24). The only way to fix this was to import a new version of srch_strings into SleuthKit. After importing the new version, we managed to get keyword searching to work with up to three characters, and on the letter “e” alone, got 3 million hits.

For our project, our data gen had us searing for “cyanide”. Therefore, a keyword search for “cyanide” would be useful in finding files that contain information about the poisoning.

Conclusion

Finding artifacts and searching for keywords are extremely important to a digital investigator. Within the coming weeks, we are going to be recovering deleted files from the disk image. Stay tuned for our next blog about recovering deleted files.

The post SIFT Update 2 appeared first on The Leahy Center for Digital Investigation.

Read the original at: The Leahy Center for Digital InvestigationFiled Under: Digital Forensics, Uncategorized Tagged With: Autopsy, Blog Post, Champlain College, cyanide, Digital forensics, files, forensics, investigator, LCDI, Projects, SIFT, Sleuthkit, Student Work

About

This site aggregates posts from various digital forensics blogs. Feel free to take a look around, and make sure to visit the original sites.

  • Contact
  • Aggregated Sites

Suggest a Site

Know of a site we should add? Enter it below

Sending

Jump to Category

All content is copyright the respective author(s)